Should The Devil Wears Prada 2 be Boycotted?
This is part 3 of M.W. Wolf’s Inside the Epstein Files.
The Devil Wears Prada and the Illusion of Glamour: When Fiction Foreshadows Reality.
The Blunt Sisters and Touchy-Tucci Wear Prada Whilst Getting Peggied for Epstein 2
The Double Blunt- Tucci sordid rise: Careers and Fortunes built on a spine of abuse and pillaging!
We are in the presence of a shift in Social Darwinism. Evolutionary Game Theory played out before our eyes.
Fact… with a small squirt of Gonzo Journalism.
Gallows Humour Warning!
Health Warning to Self and Others.
Please note, we absolutely must make these connections, and we absolutely must protect ourselves and our children because for far too long these crimes and behaviours have been ignored, appeased for power, or enabled for money. Yet we should not accuse people of stuff they did not do. Just because they pressed for Epstein to attend after parties or the like, well after he was a known child sexual predator on the prowl, it doesn’t mean that they are the same as him. But it definitely means they are unreputable people or are so money hungry that they leave their morals at the door.
Yet, late last night, failing to sleep, I watched a podcast with Ron Swanson and Jon Wedger, the former London based policeman and whistleblower. Jon has a long history of dealing with this shit. He has campaigned for many years and supports survivors of abuse especially in the fight against child abuse. He dedicated his whole good conduct and long service policing career to this cause and now continues the fight long after. He’s a proper old-school bobby. Yet last night Jon spoke of the prolonged effects of trauma. He warned fans and other good people who care about these crimes to be careful, because exposure eats you. It taints your soul and causes trauma long after. Jon is dealing with these afflictions and advises that we should not get too dragged into the files and the filth and the sordid underworld as it will cause mental health concerns.
With Jon’s advice, I see that these Epstein files and the wider litigations I’m fighting against IP abusers who intersect with these files, is eating me. Thus after this article/ report I’m giving it a rest… at least for a while. I’m going to divert my attention back towards the things I should be doing, which is to say United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit case against Riot Games and the RECO case against Jonny Geller, Felicity Blunt of CBG/ UTA Et al. And of course, walking my dog.
The Peg-Stain Infiltration and The Spectrum of Epstein’s criminal enterprise.
Felicity Blunt the Wicked Witch of CBG’s Book Theft, her husband Stanley Potato Head Tucci, and her sister Emily gormless sociopath Blunt all got “Peggied” for Epstein at The Devil Wears Prada shindigs in 2006 and have been performing the same persistent sordid three-way since. Yet now it’s sometimes a four-way, with John Krasinski tagging-in for a slice of Pizza and a licky-licky from time to time.
Reports suggest that the Epstein Library released thus far, accounts for only around 2% of the total files. In this 2%, Peggy Siegal is mentioned in the files in 7,388 Results. Safe to say that she and Jeffy WankStain were good pals.
However, this 2% of the files, or indeed all the files, will not give us a full sordid enterprise mapped out or listed, or even in a “Black Book.” We must use the evidence we do have to untangle this self-cannibalising web of filth. We must be careful not to come to solid unfounded conclusions. Yet we must also analyse the snippets of evidence which we do have at our disposal, to see behaviours, relationships, patterns, links, connections, beggers of Epstein’s presence, people and organizations he mediated through and celebrities who used the Peg-Stain Enterprise to gain fame, fortune, status, jobs, connections and perhaps time with underaged minors sent to screenings, premieres, private parties and dinners to be drugged and raped.
I believe that it is possible that with such a vast archive to trundle through, packed with deep and entangled crimes and filth, with many different ventures, organizations and criminal activities to untangle, the United States Department of Justice has pulled an absolute blinder. By releasing the Epstein Library, they have recruited the help of hordes of Amateur Sleuths and victims of related industries and topics to build cases, solve crimes, map patterns, expose the wronguns, cut out the rot, clean up the industries and most importantly, protect children from being abused and trafficked by these monsters. Or are the Epstein files just a distraction?
I fucking hope the demonic creatures are sweating as they franticly delete evidence, or announce that they are retiring, or sell up shares, or call board meetings to discuss PR tactics, or plan the excuses, or set fire to their offices to burn the evidence, or ship data to cloud servers out of the reach of US and Uk law enforcement organisations, or suddenly feign a Protected Characteristic which means we can’t accuse them. Like Mandelson’s “I’m gay” excuse.
I applaud the Department of Justice for releasing the files. It was very brave and brazen. The people asked for it, the people got it… well at least a small fraction of it, zealously redacted. If someone could forward this to the DOJ for me, I would request, with a pretty please, that they release the rest of the files. And if Jonny Geller, Felicity Blunt, Curtis Brown Group, Riot Games or United Talent Agency appear in the unreleased files, please don’t redact their names. Better still, just drop those files on my desk on your way through to arrest them… if they are found to have been engaging in criminal activity… which I suggest they have. Namely I allege a pattern of RECO activity and systemic IP and copyright infringement, gaslighting, targeting vulnerable people to steal work from, defrauding stakeholders, digital intrusion, spoliation of evidence, audit violations, and that’s just against me.
Thus, I’m here, a victim of the con who cannot bring myself to write fiction anymore. My trauma writing, my one true cathartic release, my medicine, it’s all out of my reach, because I’m so disaffected by the systematic relentless and shameful raping of my Megaverse by the prementioned abusers at Curtis Brown Group. Two of whom are demonstrably entangled with Epstein, and are key players in CBG, and are married to each other.
Jonny Geller & The Double Blunt- Tucci human centipede have led me to the Epstein files. I’ve seen the Darkside of the Entertainment and Talent Industry (Check out my blog of the same name), and I want to help. Both myself and others. I have helped. I’ve done my bit to expose sexual predators in the UK comedy circuit. I’ve help people avoid the Baby Reindeer sexual predator; I’ve supported victims. And I will help take down more. Go read M.W. Wolf’s blog on The Cries of Silence.
Even if it’s just a nibble, I’ve done my bit. Have you done yours?
The Double Blunt- Tucci Triangle of self-self-self-glorification, Epstein begging, Epstein “Dinners” and Felicity Blunt’s alleged fiendish IP raping of the M.W. Wolf catalogue of fiction, has carried me here. I’m here to help. Yet my cause is not completely altruistic, I want to taste flesh in my fangs. The dripping lifeblood of the organisations who have harmed me and so many others, many of whom are, or were, children. Like Lio Tipton who was almost sold to a Saudi prince, or Virginia Giuffre who is alleged to have been made to have sex with a former prince. Or like the many children who go missing around the world each year, never to be found again.
There’s a massive difference between stealing a man’s trauma writing and un-alive-ing children, or trafficking children. But I suggest that if you can’t keep your hands off a vulnerable and disabled man’s trauma pages you’re on the sinful spectrum of deceitful deeds, heading down the well of wickedness. Its filth covered walls are slippery, once you start to slide, it’s fucking hard to stop. I further suggest that if you’re sliding down the filth shoot with your head up your husband in a human centipede, there isn’t no sunshine gonna save your sorry ass, which your sister has her head up. Furthermore, if your husband has a history of begging for Epstein to attend his after parties, whilst you’ve been misusing your position to steal books and push his shit… you’re gone girl. Far too gone for saving. Your now firmly a satanic Black Blood vampire (from The Fateless Child, don’t steal) with shit and puss running through your veins. You’re now at the bottom of that well, impaled in the row behind Epstein, who is impaled through the rectum behind Fred West, all waiting to burn in hell whilst Vlad the Impaler dines on soft cream cheese and bagels seasoned with eyelids and double dipped in blood.
Thus I’m trolling through the 3 million files to help clean up the entertainment and talent industries. Because I smell a filthy fat rat infestation and I’m going to flush them out!
Thus all connections should be examined and scrutinized to try to come to some evaluations of the deeply entangled web of filth which Epstein weaved for decades. Let it be noted, Epstein did not summon, pay, nor sponsor these celebrities and their parties, screenings, and the like, just because he is a movie buff, which has been used as a defence. That’s horse shit and we all know it. He was infiltrating and building connections and leverage and power and “Access”. Access is currency in the self-cannibalizing entertainment and talent industry. Please read my blog on this for more information and insight.
Access is Currency in The Self-Cannibalizing Web of RICO Activity- https://www.mwwolf-fiction.co.uk/mw-wolfs-blog/access-is-currency-in-the-self-cannibalizing-web-of-rico-activity
Thus, if you were on Epstein’s radar, or in one of his many extended social and influence circles, it wasn’t because he liked you. He was not Joe Rogan having good conversations with people he is interested in. He was not Joe Rogan examining the world and trying to unwrap things. Far from it. Epstein was a convicted paedophile. A known sex trafficker of minors. A financial fraudster. A deeply embedded spy for hire. An entrapment and blackmailing conman. He was not your friend.
Thus if you were on Epstein’s radar, or in one of his many extended social and influence circles, you were picked because he wanted to use you as a “Dry Asset” and many didn’t give two fucks, so long as they gained “ACCESS.”
It’s a win-win situation when both participating parties are utter scumbags without a grain of moral direction and without a conscience to prevent them from begging for more.
Let’s call the network what it was: a criminal enterprise built around sexual exploitation, coercion, recruitment, and transactional access.
I call it a Trafficking, Entrapping Sordid Satanic Fuck Fest for Elites Disguised as “Access” or “Modelling” or “Dinners” or “After the After Parties”.
Public court findings, victim testimony, and federal prosecutions establish that Jeffrey Epstein operated a structured system involving recruiters, facilitators, enablers, associates, and financial beneficiaries. The language of “access,” “modelling opportunities,” “dinners,” and “after-parties” frequently functioned as gateways into that system.
If you are entangled in these webs, either by friendships, business, invites, by affiliation, entrapment, begging for access, or by proximity, you fit into shifting roles within The Spectrum of Epstein’s Criminal Enterprise. It should be noted that not all roles are criminal, many are victims. Yet sometimes even victims become abusers. That’s the slippery nature of evil. You let it in, and it will consume you. If you are exposed to it as a victim, you will have to work hard for the rest of your life to not let the evil, the darkness and the trauma consume your soul. Atonement, coming clean, and washing your hands of sin will help heal your soul. Silence, complicity and further abuse of people or work or money will only feed the Burning Black Beast of Darkness infesting your minds and souls.
“I didn’t know” just don’t cut it anymore, it never did, you just got away with it for far too long that you thought it was ok to continue Feigning Ignorance.
The Spectrum of Epstein’s Criminal Enterprise.
Victim- Enabler- Associate- Aspirant Seeking Access- Begger- Participant- Player- Paid- Payor- Entrapper- Recruiter- Organizer – Insider- Partner- Epstein… Satan.
Open Secret - Half a Century of Crimes
Epstein has a long history of these horrendous crimes dating back to his days at Bear Stearns (1976–1981). People who worked at Bear Stearns have stated that everybody knew even back then in the 70s & 80s. That’s like over 50 years… half a century of these crimes. The victims must be in the tens of thousands. He did have accusers, but everybody looked the other way. This is the same pattern we see with Harvey Weinstein, Jean-Luc Brunel and other high profile rich and powerful abusers. As long as the money is piled high, the sniff is good and the champagne is flowing, most didn’t give a fuck about the children trafficked from small African villages to be used as sex dolls.
I recently happened across the case of Lio Tipton (formerly Analeigh Tipton). Lio was an America's Next Top Model contestant, formally a competitive figure skater. Lio, who appeared on Cycle 11 of America’s Next Top Model, was scammed by a fake modelling agency and almost sold to a Saudi Prince. The man, unnamed, of the fake modelling agency offered Lio an opportunity to meet some men for employment but instead Lio was taken on a dinner date with a Saudi prince who later paid a sum of money the Lio to be one of his wives. Fortunately Lio escaped the situation. Don’t know about you, but to me it sounds an awful lot like the tactics and MO of Epstein.
You can see Lio talk about the incident on this link- https://www.instagram.com/reel/DI-4qcSTGRs/
Thus these crimes are widespread and have been an open secret for many decades within the modelling, fashion, talent and entertainment organizations. The casting couch was bad; this is much worse. This stuff is pure evil.
The Devil Wears Prada and the Real Fashion Ecosystem
The Devil Wears Prada (2006) was produced by 20th Century Fox and heavily embedded in the New York fashion publicity circuit. When The Devil Wears Prada was released in 2006, audiences largely interpreted it as a sharp but comedic satire of the fashion world. It was seen as a story about ambition, ego, impossible standards, and the brutal machinery of image-making. Yet, viewed from the vantage point of the post-Epstein era, the film feels less like satire and more like a coded study of Elite Gatekeeping Systems.
It doesn’t help that many of the cast and crew are like 4 or 5 steps deep on The Spectrum of Epstein’s Criminal Enterprise.
The Devil Wears Prada feels like a disguised exposé, or even a taunt by those very same elite gatekeeping systems which steal innocence, beauty, wealth, talent, work, flesh, writing, projects, awards, and even industries.
If these gatekeepers can not keep their hands off flesh, or cannot part themselves from, perhaps, the worst and most prolific child sex trafficking network the world has ever been exposed to, and long after the head of the serpent had been convicted of soliciting sex from a minor, then they can not be trusted to keep their filthy hands off our pages, our trauma, our work, our portfolios, our literary estates. These creatures need to be weeded out. Exposed and blacklisted.
Yet the elite gatekeeping systems in place, still do the exact opposite. They blacklist victims, target them, shame them, gaslight them, use harassing litigation to exhaust them and deplete their funding, their strength, their lives. These systems use smear campaigns, they build plausible deniability into their theft and abuse, they murky the waters by spreading the tendrils of theft and abuse so wide that it becomes a tangled web of abuse, deceit and filth, that nobody can make heads or tails of. That it seems so farfetched, so deep, so embedded that it cannot be true. But it is. We are seeing these crimes and abuses and filthy networks being exposed, in real time, right now.
We are in the blinding mist of global restructuring.
We are in the presence of a shift in Social Darwinism. Evolutionary Game Theory (EGT) played out before our eyes. “Grudgers” holding the “Cheaters” to account for their crimes and abuses against the “Suckers” who are the masses. Richard Dawkins popularised this evolutionary phenomenon of reciprocal altruism in The Selfish Gene. In my M.W Wolf’s Inverted Organelle of Consciousness & Universe- https://www.mwwolf-fiction.co.uk/the-inverted-organelle I make the argument that everything in existence is Micro and Macro Mirroring- https://www.mwwolf-fiction.co.uk/mw-wolfs-blog/micro-and-macro-mirroring
Thus, here, I state that the same phenomenon takes place in social evolution, yet the flood has been held back by Elite Gatekeeping Systems for far too long, and now the dam is crumbling, ready to burst wide open.
The Devil Wears Prada’s Links to Peggy Siegal & Epstein.
Peggy Siegal & Epstein.
Peggy Siegal has stated that she met Jeffrey Epstein in 2005. According to her accounts and investigative reports, Siegal believes they met sometime in 2005 and became "social friends" because Epstein was a film buff who wanted to attend her high-profile screenings. Following Epstein's release from jail in 2009, Siegal played a key role in helping him re-enter elite social circles in New York. In 2010, she famously organised a dinner at Epstein's Manhattan townhouse for Prince Andrew. Over the years, their relationship involved numerous social invitations, screenings, and even financial transactions, such as Epstein paying for a $15,000 ticket for Siegal to attend an Oscars party in 2013. Peggy Siegal received regular payments from Epstein and made monthly invoices to fashion and modelling agencies. One gets the vibe that she worked for him on more that is being disclosed currently. The Epstein Pegger might already be on the radar of the DoJ. It’s not too far of a stretch to suppose that if these celebrities were dealing with Peggy, they were also indirectly and knowingly dealing with Jeffrey Epstein. Siegal's business collapsed in 2019 after her extensive ties to Epstein were detailed in a New York Times report, leading major clients like Netflix and Disney to sever ties. It is unknown if she is under investigation.
20th Century Studios
In the Blog article- Monitoring Assessment- New Buffy-
https://www.mwwolf-fiction.co.uk/mw-wolfs-blog/monitoring-assessment-new-buffy - I’ve mapped ties and professional proximity between 20th Century Fox, Josephson, Epstein and Blunt. Felicity Blunt, her husband Stanley Tucci and her sister Emily Blunt have had a relationship with and have pitched projects to 20th Century Studios since Stanley starred in: A Life Less Ordinary (1997). This relationship has been propagated by Peggy Siegal for a long time, perhaps sponsored by Epstein, yet this is still under investigation. The Emily Blunt, Felicity Blunt and Tucci relationship with both 20th Century Studios and Peggy Siegal seems to be deeply entwined at least since The Devil Wears Prada in 2006, where Peggy Siegal organised screenings, intimate parties and after parties. Epstein, Waggingtail Entertainment and Bryan Bantry may have been involved with the financing and profiting of these events.
20th Century has been one of the go-to studios for several of the Sub-Cases of my Pending RECO claim. These include The Creator (2023). In additional titles under review for the RECO case, is A Thousand Blows. This was Commissioned by Disney+. 20th Television. 20th Century Studios: INDIRECT / CORPORATE. 20th Century Studios has a proven history of working with Peggy Siegal and The Double Blunt- Tucci Triangle, indirectly connected to Epstein. The New Buffy show is also under monitoring because of the web of connections it has to 20th Century and The Double Blunt- Tucci Triangle.
Taken together, the documented relationships between Emily Blunt, Peggy Siegal, Waggingtail Entertainment, Barry Josephson, Epstein and 20th Century Fox establish a pattern of recurring professional proximity within overlapping studio, publicity, and production environments. While no direct contractual relationship between Epstein and 20th Century Fox has been demonstrated in the cited materials, the documentary record confirms that individuals operating within Blunt-related projects were simultaneously engaged in communications with Epstein and were active within the 20th Century production and promotional ecosystem. The relevance of this network lies not in asserting wrongdoing, but in mapping the structural intersections between representation, studio development, and individuals later implicated in separate legal proceedings.
This contextual framework is necessary when assessing development chains and institutional proximity in related projects. Given these findings, which are evidenced facts, coupled with the relationships, and The Double Blunt- Tucci Triangle, and the 20th Century Fox released Sub-Cases already mentioned in the Pending RECO, projects developed by 20th Century Fox are already highly risky, if not already embedded in a bed of Epstein’s filth.
Epstein’s links to The Cast and Crew of The Devil Wears Prada 2
The Double Blunt- Tucci Triangle.
I’ve shown in Part 1 and Part 2 of Inside the Epstein Files that I believe that The Double Blunt- Tucci Triangle is a sordid three-way of abuse, IP theft, selling out artists and writers, and begging for the presence of grand master mushroom-dick Epstein and the things, or people, he brought to the after party dinner table. The first threads of The Double Blunt- Tucci Triangle and sordid three-way are alleged to have begun with them meeting each other and then meeting The Peg-Stain couplet on the set and party / promotion circuit of The Devil Wears Prada in 2006. Since then they have been triple-stitched arse-to-mouth, getting worse and worse each year… I allege.
Crew
Michael Bederman
In reviewing potential indirect industry links between The Devil Wears Prada 2 (2026) and individuals appearing in the Epstein document releases, it is notable that Michael Bederman, now credited as an Executive Producer on The Devil Wears Prada 2, previously worked on Arbitrage (2012). In the 42-page Arbitrage production budget contained within the Epstein document dataset (EFTA01086402), Bederman appears under production staffing as Assistant Unit Production Manager, budgeted at standard DGA low-budget scale, with a total listed compensation of $115,500.
Separately, public reporting has indicated that Arbitrage director Nicholas Jarecki had a social or professional relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, and that Epstein possessed materials relating to the film. However, no court finding has established that Epstein directly financed Arbitrage, and the presence of a production budget within the released documents does not, on its own, demonstrate funding involvement. Yet it has been reported (unconfirmed) that Epstein help fund this movie.
The relevance of this overlap is therefore limited to documented professional proximity within the film industry rather than evidence of financial participation or coordinated activity. If proven, this may show that Michael Bederman was an Assistant Unit Production Manager on Arbitrage being paid by a convicted predator of children, in an industry which knew all too well what the likes of Jeffrey Epstein and Harvey Weinstein were up to. I do not make any assumptions of Mr Bederman’s involvement nor ignorance. I’m just painting a proximity map to better understand how Epstein and other abusers (Flesh & Pages) of the industry, such as the alleged head conspirator of the pending RECO claim of M.W. Wolf vs Jonny Geller & Felicity Blunt of CBG/UTA ET AL Defendants.
Enrico Ballarin
Enrico Ballarin worked as a Line Producer (segment "Italy") on Devil Wears Prada 2.
In the Epstein document dataset (EFTA01059511), a December 10, 2016, email forwarded to Jeffrey Epstein contains a financing proposal for The Aspern Papers. The materials outline equity investment terms, recoupment structure, and projected sales estimates. Within that proposal, Enrico Ballarin of Mestiere Cinema is identified as the line producer in Venice. The document therefore establishes that Ballarin’s name appeared in production materials sent to Epstein in connection with a film financing pitch. However, the presence of his name in those materials does not, in itself, indicate personal communication, financial participation, or knowledge of any investment discussions involving Epstein. Perhaps it didn’t matter where the funding came from, so long as the movie got made… Therein lies the problem.
Wendy Finerman
Wendy is listed as a Producer on Devil Wears Prada 2.
In the December 24, 2015, email contained within the dataset, an individual signing off as “Jonathan” wrote from West Palm stating that Madame Claude had died and that he had emailed Wendy Finerman, suggesting that her story “would make a great mini series.” The message appears informal and speculative in nature. It is important to note that this may well be a coincidence and could simply reflect routine entertainment-industry conversation following a news event. Madame Claude had long been considered a historically dramatic figure, making adaptation discussions unsurprising. However, the reference establishes that Wendy Finerman was viewed by the sender as someone positioned to potentially develop such material and they had working relationships with.
Wendy Finerman has previously worked on film adaptations connected to rights handled by Curtis Brown Group (CBG), including projects such as P.S. I Love You, illustrating a professional relationship between her production company and CBG, within the standard literary-to-film pipeline. CBG’s CEO is Jonathan Michael Geller (Jonny Sticky-Fingers Geller).
The existence of that relationship reflects typical industry collaboration and, on its own, does not establish operational coordination beyond normal professional engagement.
Cast
Stanley Tucci
Stanley Tucci plays Nigel Kipling, the impeccably dressed and sharp-witted Art Director of Runway magazine in the 2006 film The Devil Wears Prada.
Stanley Potatohead Tucci is mentioned in the Epstein Files in 31 results. These consist of various post-conviction invites via email. In some correspondence Tucci is actively soliciting the presence of Epstein at a screening and a private party long after Epstein was convicted of soliciting minors for sex. It has since been exposed that the Epstein-Brunel Network were frequently sending and bringing minors to private movie premieres, screenings, dinners, and parties to be drugged and raped by older men. It has also been exposed by multiple people in the entertainment industry that everyone knew of the wicked ways of Epstein, Peggy, Harvey Weinstein and the pimping out of girls via modelling and talent agencies since at least the 70s.
Thus, if everyone knew of this open secret and the wicked ways of the industry, why is Touchy-old-Tucci and his wife, 21 years his minor soliciting the presence of Epstein in March 2018 after 50 years + of abuse and even convictions for said abuse? Strange!
Stanley Tucci and renowned New York publicist Peggy Siegal have a long-standing professional relationship, with Siegal frequently hosting high-profile, exclusive screenings and events for Tucci’s films in New York City over the years.
Stanley Tucci films with any documented Peggy Siegal linkage:
At least 4 provable movies films
· The Devil Wears Prada (2006)
· The White Countess (2005)
· Margin Call (2011)
· Final Portrait (2018)
Non-film but still critical: Tucci events tied to Epstein
· Stanley Tucci appears 31 times in Epstein file results
Tucci and Felicity Blunt are on:
· 2012 London screening + dinner YES list with Epstein present
· 2017 London dinner YES list organised by Siegal, post-conviction
These are not film productions, but they directly involve Tucci, Siegal, and Epstein together, which is highly relevant to this analysis and wider question of Should The Devil Wears Prada 2 be Boycotted?
3. Waggingtail’s role (important correction)
· Peggy Siegal Company invoices were paid by Waggingtail Entertainment Ltd
· Waggingtail paid Siegal monthly
· Waggingtail took commission from Siegal revenue
· Bryan Bantry corresponded directly with Epstein on this structure
When Peggy Siegal hosted Tucci-linked screenings or parties during the Waggingtail period, Waggingtail is structurally upstream of those events, even if not credited on the film. That is a corporate-mechanics link, not a creative credit link.
Since starring in The Pelican Brief (1993) 20th Century Fox / Studios has been the studio distributors or producers of at least 10 of the movies he has starred in.
File- EFTA00470494
One of which is an April 1, 2013, email from Peggy Siegal to Epstein titled, “THE COMPANY YOU KEEP.”
More concerning is this file- On Fri, 09 Mar 2018, in file EFTA00470494, Peggy Siegal is repeatedly following up and asking Epstein to attend a VIP screening of Final Portrait to “Celebrate” Stanley Tucci. She then invites Epstein to attend an after “party with Stanley and our co-host, Dominique Levy, at the prestigious Levy Gorvy Gallery on Madison Avenue and 73rd Street.” This shows that Stanley Tucci via Peggy Siegal is practically begging a convicted paedophile to attend Stanley’s party. Stanley Tucci also appears in other invites and in short, untitled lists of names in the Epstein files. The lists include Film directors, Actors, Writers, Cultural figures and Media executives.
Emily Gormless Sociopath Blunt
Emily Blunt got her breakout role in The Devil Wears Prada in 2006 as the high-strung, sharp-tongued Emily Charlton. The Ugly one from The Devil Wears Prada has pulled the same gormless emotionally void face in endless movies, which she should never have been cast in… save for the perverted casting couch Holly-Weirds with fetishes of impassive refillable plastic dolls. Emily Blunt has less facial expression range than a plastic mask. It would not surprise any sane human being if they found out that Emily Blunt is in fact a plastic replica, a stretched, passed around Hollywood satanic doll.
Emily Blunt was good in… said absolutely no one ever. Even in the endless parallel multiverses where every possible outcome is being played out somewhere, no intellectual sentient being as ever uttered those words.
The only facial expression Emily Blunt can make is gormless sociopath. In fact, Emily Blunt is the only person on the planet that plastic surgeons study to see the reverse effects of botox, it has actually given her more range of emotion. She can now grin like the evil witch, which has been hiding behind the plastic mask.
Criticism regarding Emily Blunt's acting style or facial expressions has surfaced, with some viewers characterizing her performances as monotonous or lacking emotion, occasionally describing them as having a "cold frown" or "vacant eyes". Others have described her on-screen presence as "flat-faced" or, in certain roles, having a "gormless" quality.
Emily Blunt and Peggy Siegal have a professional relationship, with Siegal frequently hosting high-profile, exclusive promotional events and screenings for Blunt's films. This includes a party for The Five-Year Engagement (2012) and luncheons for Sicario (2015). Siegal, known for organizing, “intimate,” high-profile screenings, also hosted a screening of Into the Woods in 2014, where she interviewed Blunt. Guess who sponsored it?
Since The Devil Wears Prada in 2006 Peggy Siegal, and perhaps Epstein indirectly via funding and planning, has been involved with these events for a least 11 of the Movies Blunt starred in up until Peggy Siegal’s links to Epstein were exposed in 2019. Some of these events were placed on directly for Blunt. There is a strong correlation between Blunt being nominated or winning awards and Peggy Siegal’s involvement / sponsoring of the screens, parties and dinners. And she was embedded deeply into the Double Blunt- Tucci Triangle.
I’ve read online conspiracies that via Peggy, Epstein paid for certain, let’s say unnamed, people to gain Oscars and other awards. Jeffrey Epstein used cultural and film-industry social spaces, including awards-season events organised by prominent publicists, to rebuild status and legitimacy after his 2008 conviction. While these events intersected with awards campaigning, there is no evidence that Epstein financed or controlled Oscar outcomes, nor that Peggy Siegal acted as an intermediary for vote-buying.
We can confer that, Epstein reportedly funded several of Siegal's professional trips, including to the Cannes Film Festival, and paid her for consulting services in 2011. Epstein purchased a $15,000 ticket via a shell company for Siegal to attend the 2013 "Night Before" Oscar gala, a major fundraising event for the Motion Picture & Television Fund. Correspondence revealed "bizarre" requests from Epstein, such as asking Siegal to arrange for high-profile stars like Anne Hathaway (star of The Devil Wears Parada), Hugh Jackman, and Jessica Chastain to travel with him to the 2013 Oscars on a private jet.
Anne Hathaway
Anne Hathaway References in Epstein Files
File: EFTA01977824
Title: Re: Thursday dinner
Date: December 1, 2010
Summary:
Anne Hathaway and BF Adam Shulman are listed among potential dinner invitees in an email discussing a dinner gathering. The email references Peggy organising and sending the guest list to Jeffrey Epstein.
Quoted reference:
“…Anne Hathaway and BF Adam Shulman…”
Citation:
EFTA01977824- Anne Hathaway an…
Nature of connection:
Hathaway appears on a proposed guest list for a dinner event discussed between Peggy Siegal and Jeffrey Epstein. No confirmation of attendance is stated in the document.
File: EFTA02417329
Title: Re: Thursday dinner
Date: December 1, 2010
Summary:
In a reply from Jeffrey Epstein to Peggy Siegal, “anne hathaway” is listed among names in a discussion about inviting individuals to a dinner. The context includes discussion of asking Tina Brown, with commentary about past articles about Epstein.
Quoted reference:
“…anne hathaway. you could ask tine, she has published some very false articles about me, but i d be happy to have her, and call a truce”
Citation:
EFTA02417329- anne hathaway. yo…
Nature of connection:
Hathaway is referenced in a discussion between Peggy Siegal and Epstein regarding a dinner invitation list. No confirmation of contact or attendance is recorded in the document.
File: EFTA02030725
Title: Anne Hathaway
Date: January 23–24, 2011
Summary:
Jeffrey Epstein asks Peggy Siegal whether Anne Hathaway is in New York on the 31st. Peggy replies that she does not know and mentions Hathaway is co-hosting the Oscars in Los Angeles.
Quoted reference:
“is ann hathaway, in ney on the 31 st”
“Do not know. She is co-hosting the Oscars on Feb. 27th in LA. Her boyfriend is Adam Schulman”
Citation:
EFTA02030725- is ann hathaway, …
Nature of connection:
Epstein directly inquires about Hathaway’s whereabouts to Peggy Siegal. Peggy responds with publicly known scheduling information. No further action is recorded in the file.
File: EFTA02075967
Title: Tribeca Film Institute – THE INTERN
Date: August 23, 2015
Summary:
An email forwarded to Epstein promotes the Tribeca Film Institute Gala Benefit and World Premiere of The Intern, starring Robert De Niro and Anne Hathaway.
Quoted reference:
“…the World Premiere of THE INTERN starring Robert De Niro and Anne Hathaway.”
Citation:
EFTA02075967- THE INTERN
Nature of connection:
Anne Hathaway is referenced as a star of the film being promoted. The document reflects event marketing sent to Epstein. No personal communication with Hathaway is recorded.
File: EFTA00305699
Title: LES MISERABLES Private Friends Screening
Date: December 9, 2012
Summary:
Invitation to a private screening of Les Misérables, starring Anne Hathaway among others.
Quoted reference:
“Starring Hugh Jackman Russell Crowe Anne Hathaway…”
Citation:
EFTA00305699- LES MISERABLES
Nature of connection:
Hathaway is listed as a cast member in the screening invitation. The document does not show direct communication between Hathaway and Epstein.
File: EFTA00635344 (Oscar diary)
Date: March 4, 2011
Summary:
The Oscar diary email includes narrative commentary about the Academy Awards where Anne Hathaway is described as co-host alongside James Franco.
Quoted reference:
“James Franco and Anne Hathaway are hip and energetic hosts.”
Citation:
EFTA00635344- Anne - Oscar diary
Nature of connection:
Hathaway is referenced in event commentary circulated to Epstein. No direct interaction is documented.
Overall Observational
Across the reviewed files:
• Anne Hathaway appears in guest lists and invitation discussions.
• Jeffrey Epstein directly inquired about her availability in one email.
• She appears in film screening invitations and Oscar-related commentary.
• No documentation confirms direct correspondence between Anne Hathaway and Jeffrey Epstein.
• No documentation confirms attendance at the proposed dinner.
Anne Hathaway Feature Films Connected to 20th Century Fox or Peggy Siegal
1. The Devil Wears Prada (2006)
Produced and distributed by 20th Century Fox
Documented New York screening activity associated with Peggy Siegal
2. Love & Other Drugs (2010)
Produced and distributed by 20th Century Fox
Documented New York screening activity associated with Peggy Siegal
3. Rio (2011)
Produced by Blue Sky Studios
Distributed by 20th Century Fox
4. Rio 2 (2014)
Produced by Blue Sky Studios
Distributed by 20th Century Fox
It's clear that Jeffery Epstein tried to get close to Anne Hathaway. There is no proof that she attended the dinners or screenings. Yet at least two of the movies Anne Hathaway starred in had screening activities associated with Peggy Siegal. One of which was The Devil Wears Prada (2006). Anne has starred in at least four movies Distributed by 20th Century Fox, two of those were the two associated with Peggy Siegal.
Meryl Streep
Meryl Streep plays Miranda Priestly, the formidable, ice-cold editor-in-chief of the fictional Runway magazine in the 2006 film The Devil Wears Prada.
Meryl Streep References Within the Epstein Files
The released correspondence and device extractions include multiple documented instances in which Meryl Streep’s name appears in connection with events to which Jeffrey Epstein was invited or which he discussed. Meryl Streep headlined events were frequently attended by Jeffrey Epstein, with invites via Peggy Siegal. The material shows repeated proximity at the level of public film premieres and gala events long after Jeffrey Epstein was known to be a convicted sexual predator of minors.
1. Suffragette Premiere, October 12, 2015
In an email from Peggy Siegal to Jeffrey Epstein dated October 12, 2015, regarding the premiere of Suffragette at the Paris Theater, Siegal writes:
“Cary Mulligan and Meryl Streep coming. Film terrific. Bring a date.”
This appears in file EFTA02484296, page 1.
The email confirms that Epstein was officially invited to attend a premiere event at which Meryl Streep was expected to appear.
There is no email in the file from Streep directly. The invitation was issued by Siegal.
2. The Iron Lady Screening
An invitation relating to The Iron Lady premiere references Meryl Streep in connection with the event.
This appears in file EFTA00422833.
The documents indicate Epstein received or was circulated screening information connected to that film.
3. Bully Screening at The Paley Center
An email references a screening of Harvey Weinstein’s documentary Bully at The Paley Center that was hosted by Meryl Streep and Epstein was invited to.
This appears in file EFTA00931217.
The correspondence includes Epstein in the invitation chain.
4. Chaplin Award Gala, Film Society of Lincoln Center
Correspondence referencing a gala event hosted by the Film Society of Lincoln Center lists presenters including Meryl Streep.
This appears in file EFTA01051755.
The communications indicate Epstein’s financial participation at the donor level for the event.
5. Internal Message Reference, March 9, 2017
In a device extraction of iMessage correspondence dated March 9, 2017, Epstein writes:
“is there an actress or model that represents your proclivity.? i hope not meryl streep. I will be of no help”
This appears in file EFTA01209003, page 5.
This is a private conversational reference to her name.
6. “Movie Premier on the 13k Meryl Streep”
An internal email reference includes the phrase “movie premier on the 13k meryl streep.”
This appears in file EFTA00924486.
The context suggests discussion of attendance at a premiere event associated with her name. The correspondence references a ‘movie premier on the 13k meryl streep’ in file EFTA00924486. The document does not specify what ‘13k’ refers to. No explicit statement in that document states that $13,000 was paid to Meryl Streep, nor that $13,000 was paid for her personally. It may be for sponsorship levels, table purchases, donor tiers, benefit ticket pricing or several other things.
Summary of Documented Pattern
Across the files released:
Epstein was invited to multiple film premieres and gala events featuring Meryl Streep.
Her name was used prominently in invitation correspondence.
Invitations were transmitted through publicist channels.
Her name appears in internal device communications referencing film events.
Her name appears in at least one private iMessage exchange.
Meryl Streep hosted some of the events which Jeffery Epstein was invited to, after his 2006 conviction.
The documents demonstrate repeated event-level proximity between Epstein and events at which Meryl Streep was present or headlined. The files do not contain direct email correspondence between Streep and Epstein. They document invitation-level and event-level connection through screening circuits and gala culture.
Observations and Concerns Arising from the Record
The files reviewed show that Meryl Streep’s name headlined multiple film premieres and screening events to which Jeffrey Epstein was invited through publicist channels. The documents establish repeated event-level proximity between Epstein and events where Streep was appearing as host, presenter, or featured attendee. The files do not contain direct correspondence between Streep and Epstein. They do not show her personally issuing invitations. The invitations visible in the record were sent by Peggy Siegal.
However, the pattern raises broader questions. Epstein’s 2008 conviction was public knowledge. Despite this, he continued to receive invitations to high-profile cultural events where major actors, including Streep, were headlining. This leads to reasonable accountability questions:
What vetting procedures governed guest lists for these premieres and galas?
Did headline hosts have oversight over donor or invitation lists?
Were convicted individuals screened or excluded from attendance?
If not, why Fucking not?
Silence Is Complicit
Silence Is Complicit is a phrase being tossed at many in the entertainment and modelling industries. Too many have looked the other way whilst abusers and bullies such as Harvey Weinstein, Jean-Luc Brunel and Jeffery Epstein and other powerful gatekeepers, deal makers, and access providers, abuse children, women, men, flesh, stories, pages, talent, IP and lives.
The record demonstrates that Epstein retained access to elite screening and gala circuits for years after his conviction. Whether headline figures were aware of specific attendees cannot be determined from the documents reviewed. The concern is that a convicted offender was able to repeatedly access cultural spaces associated with major public figures without any documented indication of exclusion. That raises institutional and governance questions within premiere and gala culture.
It appears that those attending these events, and those headlining the events did not give too fucks that Jeffery Epstein was a horrible child sexual predator operating for half a century in the open, in these event spaces, with underaged girls reportedly being transported to the screenings, dinners, parties, then drugged and raped.
There is no excuse for allowing this. This is enabling by invite. People obviously cared more for the social clout and money then they did for the safety of children, the thousands of young women and girls who have had their lives, their hopes and dreams shattered, shredded, absolutely obliterated by Jeffery Epstein, Harvey Weinstein and Jean-Luc Brunel.
And now that it’s out in the open, and they cannot profiteer nor partake in this filth ring, some of the they very same celebrities are like “I’m doing this to raise money for abuse against women and girls #empowerment #GirlPower #MeToo and so on.
I write silly shit like the Wolf is hungry, and the Wolf drinks blood and other satirical nonsense like that as self-deprecating humour, it’s a joke. Yet, if these Epstein style crimes happened to somebody I love, no amount of # Bullshit would even register. The massacre would send all Holly-Weirds into hiding forever more. And nobody lives happily ever after. Because the Wolf would be on the hunt until not a single complicit soul was left to consume.
You looked away did you? Dead. You booked them into a hotel room did you? Dead. You attended the screening did you? Dead. Dead fucking Dead, Dead.
Not just any old dead. We’re talking The Shining elevator scene type Dead.
(that’s a great premise for a book. Don’t tell Jonny sticky-fingers Fat-Pig, he’ll have it sold to his Netflix contacts before you can say Tax Dodger Sellout).
In the same vein of evil deeds, literary and talent agents, who hung with Jeffy Wank-Stain, and who abuse IP, books, scripts, plans and ideas are spouting the very same Pseudo-moralistic horse shit, moral gloating and virtue signalling while they abuse the work of the 90% of writers who never make a living. They sell the “Slush Pile” and synopsises of disadvantaged and disabled aspiring writers to the likes of 20th Century, Netflix and Riot Games. Or they take the solicited queries and give it to shark tank writing rooms to cut up and feed into endless shit shows and movies. And when they are not thieving, they spend all the time they were meant to be finding books to publish, pushing their husband’s shit cookbooks which nobody needs. They get away with it because their partner in crime is also the CEO of the agency.
The partner in crime, sticky-fingered CEO is a super-duper Mega Agent, yet in the decades he’s been syphoning off cash, he has discovered or helped build very few careers. Most of his clients are wealthy celebrities seeking one time deals and perhaps somebody who can fiddle the books and gain tax breaks. He also uses some of the prementioned topics to gain government cultural tax brakes from the stolen work, as if stealing isn’t bad enough, he has to steal work, then steal from the tax pot on top. Or he feeds the queries to his Pet Writers (Female of course), to scam commissioned money off the likes of Marvel for a Marvel crime novel, then they go to the US on book tours with the stolen work, drinking cocktails and leaving used condoms on the hotel room floors whilst the wife is at home caring for the two and a half kids.
Oh, and the law isn’t going to help you. It cost like £10,000 to open a copyright case in the UK, because that’s not bias is it. And in LA, well that place runs on money forged off the blood of innocence. And here’s us sub-human peasants thinking lady Justice is blindfolded to symbolize impartiality. Without fear or favour and all that good stuff.
Half of Hollywood and New York’s elite and celebrity circles acted like they were also blindfolded. I didn’t know just don’t cut the mustard any-fucking-more. It never fucking did. You fucking sickos.
No wonder the literary, talent, modelling and entertainment industries are rife with absolute filth bags like Epstein and Weinstein.
I’ve had just about my fill of Epstein Files for a little while. After the conclusion is a list of Crew members of The Devil Wears Prada links to Epstein.
Conclusion
Thus in conclusion: Should The Devil Wears Prada 2 be Boycotted?
Should you shit in a bag and swing it around the room? Nope… but it would be more fun, less messy and more morally correct than watching Epstein beggars and profiteers pretending to act like the stuck up, money hording, self-righteous fakers which they really are behind their glittery off screen facades. Its monsters acting like humans to play monsters to gain access to gain more money, fame and more high-level access to monsters.
Listen to the title: The Devil Wears Prada. It’s not subtle. It wears it’s darkness in a pair of ruby red heels. It suggests that beneath the couture, the glamour, the bright lights, the money, the power, there is something darker at work. The film hints that the industry’s obsession with status, image and access is not elegance but temptation, the illusion of glamour masking a harsher moral reality. The shine is the devil’s branding. The price of access is compromise of flesh. In chasing proximity to power at any cost, the glitter begins to look less like aspiration and more like seduction.
The devil does not arrive in smoke and flame. He arrives tailored, polished and celebrated. The film’s title reminds us that corruption rarely looks grotesque, it looks aspirational. It looks like success. It looks like entry into a room everyone else wants to enter. That is the illusion of glamour. Its all fun and games until the room wobbles, your tummy churns, the heels snap, you hit the deck, the lights dim to blackout, and the devil’s face appears from the blackness.
Now you wish you shat in a bag and swung it around the room. Don’t watch The Devil Wears Prada 2, you might as well be summoning Epstein up from hell. If he is even truly dead that is. I heard a rumour that the real Epstein is a shapeshifter. He morphed into a lady like creature to attend the 2006 premiere of The Devil Wears Prada where he seduced Stanley potato-head Tucci, then married him in 2012.
The Devil Wears The Skin of A Witch.
Now that’s a movie I’d watch.
M.W. Wolf
