Part 2- Cries of Silence - UK Talent and Entertainment Sexual Predator Gossip Sphere

Part 2- Cries of Silence - UK Talent and Entertainment Sexual Predator Gossip Sphere

Three part conspiracy-mapping narrative and a documentary treatment draft.

Sidenote, this article secondarily serves as a creative way of delivering a book and documentary synopsis. Do not steal!

Summary of Part 1 & Suspect Profile (for Part 2 entry point)

Narrative Overview:

Part 1 of Cries of Silence maps out a disturbing portrait of an unnamed but widely speculated high-level sexual predator operating within the UK’s entertainment and literary industries. The exposé links several alleged victims, including Richard Gadd, Levi Davis, and Aljoscha Quooss, suggesting a recurring pattern of grooming, manipulation, and rape, often hidden beneath the guise of professional mentorship and access to opportunity. This predator thrives off proximity to power, anonymity, and institutional complicity.

Part 1- Composite Suspect Profile:

Using the military-style "ABC descriptor" system, the profile is as follows:

Age: Likely mid-50s, possibly born between 1966 and 1970.

Build: Average; non-athletic "dad bod"; psychologically imposing, not physically.

Clothing: Smart-casual, subdued but professional; calculated to gain trust and blend in.

Features: Wears glasses; greying/balding hair; mild, forgettable face; blends into elite spaces.

Height: Between 5’7"–5’10"; non-distinctive and non-intimidating.

Gait: Controlled, non-flashy, measured. Walks like he’s meant to be there- and often is.

Job: Likely a talent agent, producer, or senior literary figure; a gatekeeper in the arts/media world.

Modus Operandi: Grooming via drinks, drugs, and coercive mentorship; thrives in secluded social industry settings like VIP festival bars or artist lounges; especially targets young bisexual or gay men, but may have female victims too.

Camouflage: Respected publicly, manipulative privately; “father figure” persona; possibly part of secretive societies or religious groups /networks protecting him.

He’s all about ACCESS.

Part 2 Focus

Part 1 focused on investigating the evidence around Richard Gadd’s horrific ordeal. We could have kept going, right to the abusers door, but we really need more context and evidence before we point fingers at the company and the man. He is well connected, rich and powerful. I’m not promising I can definitely give you the name and evidence, let’s see how things progress.

Part 2 will focus on what we can gather from young Aljoscha Quooss’s horrific ordeal. Then we will run a few comparative investigations to try to narrow down our suspect and to try to ascertain if they are indeed the same suspect.

Aljoscha Quooss

Quooss is a model and digital artist with a presence on platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube. In 2024–2025, he publicly alleged that he had been groomed and manipulated by a powerful British media personality, strongly suggesting a connection to the real-life inspiration behind Baby Reindeer. He also suggested that there is a death in the past of this abuser. He has since launched a campaign for justice and support, including a GoFundMe and viral awareness efforts. Quooss has spoken about the psychological toll of adult grooming and the fear of being silenced.

Show your support to Aljoscha, as I will be shortly.

https://www.gofundme.com/f/i-was-groomed-by-a-celebrity-help-me-get-justice?attribution_id=sl:f465f5e9-42d7-4f2b-ae93-af76c332f1ab&lang=en_GB&utm_campaign=man_sharesheet_dash&utm_content=amp13_t1&utm_medium=customer&utm_source=copy_link

PTSD to PTG

Richard Gadd’s story is harrowing. Baby Reindeer was a dark, powerful, and emotionally devastating show. Richard is an incredibly brave man, not just for speaking up, but for exposing the twisted complexities of trauma, grooming, and sexuality with such raw honesty.

What makes Richard’s journey so impactful is that we, the audience, are invited into his pain only after he has survived it, processed it, and, in some ways, transformed it. Through Baby Reindeer, he doesn’t just revisit trauma, he reclaims it. He alchemizes Post-Traumatic Stress into Post-Traumatic Growth. This is agency. This is strength. This is how victims begin to win.

Richard Gadd has taken back the narrative stolen from him by his abuser. He has worn his scars publicly and reshaped them into warnings, wisdom, and awareness. He has turned pain into purpose.

Richard, you are a hero. Thank you for your courage, your storytelling, and for refusing to be silent. Baby Reindeer is not just art it is an act of resistance.

Aljoscha is Vulnerable

Aljoscha Quooss has not had time to heal. His scars are still wounds, wide open and bleeding. Also, unlike Gadd, Aljoscha has not had a foundation level of exposure in the entertainment industry… Yet. He is originally from Germany. He is cut off from his father. Thus he is somewhat isolated and alone in terms of his foundation of safety. He, perhaps partly because of the abuse, is under significant financial hardship, in the early stages of internalising the abuse and grooming.

Aljoscha recently appeared on a podcast - MOTH NEWS - ADULT GROOMING - Aljoscha Quooss - A Story Of Manipulation & Abuse Of Power, which you can find here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZRJfv7TUR0&ab_channel=AljoschaQuooss

Aljoscha’s story is unfolding in real time. Unlike Richard Gadd, who had years to process his trauma and transform it into something empowering, Aljoscha is still in the thick of it. During his podcast and interviews, it is painfully clear. He still carries the shame. He still feels responsible for what was done to him.

This is what unresolved trauma looks like. A young gay man, groomed and violated by a powerful media figure, now left to deal with the wreckage alone. He lives in the same city as his abuser. London. He is isolated, vulnerable, struggling financially, and emotionally exposed.

He has reported the abuse to the police. They didn’t seem very interested. That kind of silence deepens the isolation. It makes him feel small, invisible, powerless. It pushes him further into the darkness.

Aljoscha is aware of the abuser’s power. He is scared for his safety, and he has every right to be. He has spoken about it openly. He is not paranoid. He is perceptive. He sees the system that protects men like this. He feels what that kind of fear does to a person.

This is not a resolved narrative. This is not a survival arc. This is someone bleeding in front of us. This is a vulnerable man in need of help and support.

If Aljoscha does not get the help, the support, the protection he needs now, his pain and suffering will grow in silence. He will cut himself off. His vulnerability will become unbearable. This is not just a personal tragedy waiting to happen. It is a societal failure in progress.

Please show your help and support for him in any way you can. Donations, spreading awareness, campaigning, reaching out to police and encouraging others to come forward.

Gay is not Prey!

Aljoscha is careful with his words. You can hear it. You can see it. He is afraid. Afraid of being sued for libel. Afraid of saying too much. So he holds back. He only shares fragments. Still, even in those fragments, the picture is clear.

He admits to behaviours that some people might wrongly interpret as consent. He met the man on a dating app. They spoke for years. He went to the man’s flat. Even to his bedroom. But none of that means he consented to sex. None of that means he gave permission for what happened next.

This is what predators rely on. A slow grooming process that makes it look like trust. Makes it look like attraction. Makes it look like choice. But grooming is not consent. Drugs are not consent. Power is not consent.

These days, with all the social movement around women’s rights and the exposure of exploitation in male-dominated industries, it is likely this abuser switched focus. Grooming women became too risky. Women take longer to break now. They ask more questions. They have more support. They are more likely to be heard. But the world still doesn’t listen when a young gay man cries out.

In the eyes of many, a young bisexual or gay man is always inviting sex. That’s the stereotype. That’s the lie. If he accepts a drink, he wanted it. If he goes to a flat, he wanted it. If he regrets it, it’s just a messy night out. Not abuse. Not grooming. Not rape.

Let’s be clear. If a powerful older man lures a young woman with the promise of success, gets her drunk, drugs her, and has sex with her, we call it what it is. Grooming. Exploitation. Rape. Because consent under coercion is not consent.

But when it’s a young gay man, people look the other way. They call it a hookup. A mistake. A regret. They accuse the victim of chasing money or clout. They smear him. They mock him. They silence him.

Sexual orientation is not a green light. Being gay is not the same as saying yes. Being bisexual is not consent. Being lonely after a brake up is not consent. Being vulnerable is not consent.

Because Aljoscha is an openly gay young man. Because he met his much older abuser on a dating app. Because they struck up an online relationship not once, but twice, over several years. Because after a breakup he returned, walked into that man’s bedroom, and was abused. Because he forgave him. Because he was duped again. And because Aljoscha is now asking for help. Asking for money. Because he is vulnerable and struggling, while the man who abused him is rich and powerful, it becomes easy for outsiders to dismiss him. To say he is making it up. To call it blackmail. To frame it as regret after sex. But that is not what this is. This is grooming. This is exploitation. This is rape.

What happened to Aljoscha is no different than what happened to many of Harvey Weinstein’s victims. The only difference is gender and sexual orientation. The pattern is the same. The power dynamic is the same. The manipulation is the same. The damage is the same. People believed Weinstein’s victims. Eventually. But not before years of silence, years of protection, years of disbelief.

Aljoscha deserves to be heard now. Not later. Not when it is too late. He is not blackmailing anyone. He is not weaponizing regret. He is trying to survive. And he is brave enough to speak when so many others would have stayed quiet. This is not a scandal. This is a crime.

The Fact Summary of Aljoscha’s Grooming Ordeal

Based on Podcast Episodes, Social Media Posts, and Public Statements

Background

Aljoscha Quooss is a young (early 20s), openly gay digital artist and aspiring influencer.

He first matched with the alleged abuser on Tinder during the first week of UK COVID lockdown in 2020.

He was starstruck and intrigued but not romantically interested at the time.

Years later, following a break-up and job loss, Aljoscha reconnected with the man via Instagram, where the man had been quietly following him for years.

The Grooming Pattern

Contact resumed when Aljoscha was emotionally vulnerable, unemployed, and seeking help to promote his art.

The communication became daily, with consistent validation, flirtation masked as mentorship, and interest in Aljoscha’s background and trauma.

The man responded enthusiastically to Aljoscha’s art and creativity, framing himself as a helpful and caring supporter.

Grooming intensified via private video messages from backstage locations, suggesting the man was a celebrity or performer on tour, or someone in the background.

Aljoscha was profiled through what he described as “security questions” — deep inquiries into his mental health, family relationships, childhood trauma, and financial hardship.

These questions served to assess his vulnerability, in the same way a child predator might gauge a minor's lack of protection.

The Assault

After building trust for weeks, Aljoscha eventually visited the man at his London apartment.

What had been non-sexual quickly turned when, in the bedroom, the man appeared naked from the bathroom, catching Aljoscha off guard.

Aljoscha describes freezing, panicking, and dissociating during the encounter.

The act was not consensual, but there was shame and confusion, especially as he had not anticipated a sexual interaction.

Repeat and Realisation

After the first assault, Aljoscha attempted to rationalise the event, blaming himself and trying to maintain the relationship.

Eventually, the man crossed the line again. This time, Aljoscha recognised the abuse and cut contact completely.

Only after the second incident did the full pattern of grooming, manipulation, and exploitation become clear.

Psychological Impact

Aljoscha battled with shame, confusion, and a fear of not being believed.

Friends initially doubted his story, reinforcing his isolation.

He spoke of being gaslighted, accused of using the man, and even projected upon by strangers online.

He admitted the encounter consumed his brain, disrupted his life, and triggered symptoms of trauma and depression.

Reporting and Public Response

Aljoscha reported the incident to police, who declined to investigate without more victims coming forward.

He reached out to journalists and charities, but received limited or no response.

He has since gone public with his story in a series of podcasts and videos, describing this as a last resort for his safety and sanity.

He now lives in financial hardship, has no job, and is trying to stay mentally stable while dealing with the fallout.

Connection to Broader Pattern

Aljoscha has publicly suggested a possible link between his abuser and the predator described by Richard Gadd in Baby Reindeer, although he has no direct proof.

He believes the man has been abusing vulnerable people since at least 2003.

He believes the man has a death in his past (Murder? Overdosed after spiking with drugs?).

He is not naming the abuser directly due to fear of defamation lawsuits but has implied that the man is famous, powerful, and well protected.

Aljoscha is using social media and podcast platforms to warn others, and has openly stated:

“Gay is not consent. Grooming is grooming, no matter your age.”

Profile of the Alleged Abuser – Based on Aljoscha Quooss’ Account

Identity & Industry Position

Male, older than Aljoscha by at least 20 years (likely in his 50s or 60s).

High-profile UK celebrity, likely working in TV, media, or entertainment.

Possibly a comedian, writer, or industry insider, as he is referenced as influential, clever, charismatic, and connected to others like Richard Gadd.

Has a fake kind and perhaps soft and understanding deminer.

Seems like a listener.

Described as a father figure, then more like a grandmother figure. Harmless, caring, supportive, old.

Has a public persona that is calculated and well-maintained, known to present himself as liberal, warm, and supportive.

Protected by a circle of powerful allies in the industry.

Known to use dating apps to meet young men, especially those from artistic or creative backgrounds. Thus in this sense, Tinder was a wider anchor point, to meet in isolation and secret during lockdown.

Referenced as someone who has likely been abusing or grooming people since at least 2003.

Podcast host referenced social ques several times, then autistic was later mentioned, suggesting the abuser uses this as an excuse for the attacks.

Catholic church abusers referenced, might be from a religious background.

Lives in London.

Mentioned that there is a death in this man’s past, thus he is very dangerous.

Ali was not physically nor romantically attracted to him but swiped right because he was a “Celebrity” and wanted to see if it was really him.

Ali recognised him. Ali is a model, so it is highly likely he is familiar with agents, comedians and others.

Ali stated that the man laughed at Ali’s content and performances and implied a comical type of connection.

Stated that the man was sometimes away on tour and stated that he was in the dressing rooms and out back when he made communications. Comic? Performer? Book Tour? Agent with his Talent? Inspirational or educational speaker? Presenter?

Ali makes no mention of alcohol nor drugs.

Grooming Behaviour and Pattern

First contact occurred on Tinder at the start of the 2020 lockdown. The man followed Aljoscha on Instagram, creating early trust and validation.

Contact was reinitiated years later, after Aljoscha’s breakup and job loss, indicating opportunistic targeting when the victim was most vulnerable.

Initially non-sexual communication, heavy on validation, humour, interest in Aljoscha’s art, life, trauma, and ambitions.

Gave the impression of mentorship, friendship, and career support.

Asked “security questions” to profile Aljoscha’s vulnerabilities, including family estrangement, childhood trauma, financial hardship, and emotional availability.

The grooming escalated through persistent communication, often while the abuser was backstage or touring (video and voice notes exist).

At the key moment, the man waited until Aljoscha was in his bedroom, then appeared nude from the bathroom, initiating a shock-based sexual assault tactic.

Psychological Tactics

Played the role of a father figure or protector, someone older, wiser, caring, and safe.

Used love bombing mixed with offers of help to build trust.

Built an illusion of consent by slowly escalating the relationship from platonic to intimate under the guise of mentorship.

Applied emotional manipulation by feigning kindness and offering to promote Aljoscha’s career.

The moment sex was expected or initiated was disorienting, fast, and shocking, deliberately creating dissociation and confusion.

Reacted defensively when boundaries were reinforced, minimising the abuse or making excuses (e.g. confusion over social cues).

Uses litigious threats and is known to be well connected legally, discouraging victims and journalists from naming him directly.

Known Traits

Operates largely in London, maintains a flat or home where abuse occurred.

Possibly maintains dual reputations, a family/public persona and a private predatory one.

Consistently seeks out young gay or bisexual men, particularly vulnerable, ambitious, and isolated individuals.

Patterns suggest serial behaviour, with Aljoscha and possibly Richard Gadd sharing timelines and narrative traits.

Deeply embedded in the industry, making him feel untouchable. Victims describe this person as “untouchable,” “backed by powerful people,” and “well protected.”

Timeline for Aljoscha Quooss Grooming Allegations

Aljoscha was raped by a different person in 2018 and told his abuser.

The abuser said he has vulnerable so he might not know social ques.

The abusers suggests there are reasons he cannot come out.

The abuser goes on tours, book tours or company tours or comic shows or other.

They matched on Tinder 5 years before, in the first states of Lockdown.

March–May 2020

First COVID-19 lockdown in the UK.

Aljoscha states that during this time (five years ago from 2025), he was recruited online by a powerful British media figure.

Early stage of online "grooming" trust-building phase (not in-person yet).

After 4 years or so had passed he reached out on WhatsApp on a Saturday night.

It then turned into daily messaging again.

The man text him when he was on tour, and backstage in the dressing rooms.

Used WhatsApp and voice notes.

2020–2023

Regular online communication continues (Instagram, WhatsApp).

Building relationship, grooming happening slowly but persistently.

Early 2025 (beginning of this year)

Aljoscha and the alleged abuser meet in person for the first time.

He seeks career help; instead, he alleges he is taken advantage of twice.

Shortly after second incident (2025)

Aljoscha cuts the man out of his life.

He keeps all communications saved on his computer as evidence (WhatsApp and Instagram messages).

April 2025

Posts go viral on TikTok, YouTube.

Launches GoFundMe.

Says he believes the same man has committed "worse crimes" and that other victims may exist.

Appears on podcasts (like Keith Walsh’s Moth News) to explain the dynamics of grooming.

Actively building a legal case and public awareness campaign.

Important Notes:

Aljoscha did NOT meet the abuser physically until around January 2025.

The grooming started online during lockdown, five years before, around March–May 2020.

He has saved digital evidence, but police action has been slow or dismissive.

Industry Suspect Descriptor Log

Based on public testimony, survivor accounts, and behavioural mapping.

Utilizing the old military-style alphabetic suspect profiling system (A–J)

A – Age

Likely aged between 54 and 60

Born between 1964 and 1970

Described as significantly older than survivors (e.g. Richard Gadd, Aljoscha Quooss)

Still professionally active and socially mobile, suggesting not retired

B – Build

Average to slightly overweight ("dad bod")

Non-athletic, unremarkable frame

Not physically intimidating; exerts control through psychological authority

C – Clothing

Smart-casual style, common in literary and talent circles

May wear blazers, dark jeans, scarves, knitwear, older shoes

Style appears deliberately forgettable, avoids attention

Dresses to disarm, not to impress

D – Distinguishing Features

Wears glasses (likely prescription)

May have thinning hair, greying or dyed

Possibly bearded or with greying stubble

No visible tattoos, piercings, or scarring

Forgettable face but emotionally manipulative presence

E – Elevation (Height)

Estimated between 5’7” and 5’10”

Average height for UK males

Height not central to his influence or grooming strategy

F – Face

Mild, symmetrical, slightly aged

Described as emotionally neutral, professional, polite

May wear a faint, smug smile or "mentor’s calm"

Most memorable for how he makes people feel, not for facial uniqueness

G – Gait

Controlled, fluid, and quiet

Moves with a sense of entitlement, but not arrogance

No limp or exaggerated posture

Slides through spaces without drawing attention

Walks like a man who belongs in the room

H – Hair

Likely receding or thinning, some grey or dyed strands

Neatly kept, styled in a way to blend in

Facial hair (if any) is short, greying, and tidy

Hair not intended as a statement, just a mask

I – Identity Class (IC1 System)

White British male (IC1 classification)

Likely London-based or South England

Fluent English speaker, embedded in elite literary/entertainment circles

Possibly presents as progressive, uses liberal image as further disguise

J – Jewellery / Job

Jewellery:

Possibly a wedding ring, worn or removed situationally

May wear a simple analogue watch

No flashy or distinctive accessories

Job:

Believed to be a senior literary agent, producer, talent manager, or mentor figure

Operates in TV, publishing, comedy, or theatre

Provides "access" in exchange for loyalty or submission

Not publicly famous, but powerful within the industry

Allegedly uses job title to groom and exploit vulnerable young creatives

This man’s greatest weapon is not his physical presence, but his ability to camouflage. He gains trust, offers opportunity, and builds rapport over time. Then he exploits, often in private, often when the victim is at their lowest or most isolated.

He makes contact in secret, away from home, either digitally away (Like Tinder) or physically away on tours, festivals, shows.

He blends in. That is the danger.

Conclusion- Part 2

We have now mapped the allegations. We have followed the breadcrumbs left not by one victim, but by two (which we can cross-examine), across time, platforms, industries, and cities. What is emerging is not just a pattern, but a strategy - one that preys on trust, powerlessness, and isolation.

Aljoscha Quooss’ testimony adds serious weight to what began with Richard Gadd’s devastating story in Baby Reindeer. It offers fresh evidence of a system that rewards predators and abandons victims. A system and industry covering for cheaters, thieves and rapists. A criminal outfit by any means.

The suspect remains unnamed, but his behaviour is taking shape. His grooming methods are meticulous. His image is well-managed. His access is everything.

This is not just about individuals. It’s about systems that look the other way, about a culture that still fails to protect gay men, especially when they are young, artistic, and vulnerable. It is about how grooming doesn’t end with childhood. It adapts. It evolves. It hides behind kindness and career promises.

Aljoscha has chosen not to remain silent. Neither should we.

What comes next is comparison. Correlation. Cross-examination. Are we looking at the same man? Is there one predator operating under the surface of multiple survivor accounts, or several men using the same blueprint because they can, with impunity whilst the victims cry silent tears, and the fat cats get filthy fat on the shattered hopes and dreams of broken young Talent. Those who speak out get blacklisted, have their work stolen, they get oppressed, and sued and perhaps they get “Gone.”

We have more work to do. With enough light, even the most protected figure cannot stay hidden.

“Daddy Reindeer” will follow over the weekend. It will cross-examine the two cases (Richard Gadd and Aljoscha Quooss). Daddy Reindeer might put a little more flesh on the bones of our suspect, if I feel brave.

Part 3 will pursue the questions posed above, and more, by looking at the case of Levi Davis. This case will take a little longer to investigate and to write up.

We’re on the hunt to catch a C***

M.W. Wolf